From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Thompson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve search path handling? Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:26:12 -0500 Message-ID: <8dr3t7sf7v.fsf@freestation00.office.fsf.org> References: <87ioes9hyi.fsf@fsf.org> <878ufmadyq.fsf@fsf.org> <87bnkfpcem.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq326iy8.fsf@fsf.org> <20150228203632.GB16886@debian> <87d24r2aac.fsf@netris.org> <87lhjf92aq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSQMW-0000UB-Bl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:26:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSQMS-0000TY-5L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:26:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87lhjf92aq.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Mark H Weaver , Dave Thompson Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Mark H Weaver skribis: > >> Andreas Enge writes: >> >>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:31:59PM -0500, David Thompson wrote: >>>> Yes, I think so. I think I have resolved this, but it's a "rebuild the >>>> world" change so I don't yet know if it works. Would it be possible to >>>> add a 'wip-search-paths' branch for Hydra to build? >>> >>> Definitely! If you create and push such a branch, we can make it build = on >>> hydra. But maybe now is the moment to push lots of stuff to core-updates >>> anyway (except that there have been so many changes recently, that I wo= rry >>> if anything breaks, it will be difficult to determine why). >> >> I think we should just push this to 'core-updates' ASAP. > > I was about to enable whole-system builds for =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80= =99. > > David, do you want to try anyway or can you wait for the next round > (which I=E2=80=99ll expect will be soon, because there=E2=80=99s another = bunch of core > changes I=E2=80=99d like to make)? I think we should wait for the next round. The patch that causes a rebuild hasn't been posted here yet, and when I tried to rebuild everything on my laptop something failed. Do you think it would be worth it to push these 2 patches now and do the refactoring/rebuild stuff later? If so, I think these can just go to master, because the build system isn't touched. --=20 David Thompson Web Developer - Free Software Foundation - http://fsf.org GPG Key: 0FF1D807 Support the FSF: https://fsf.org/donate