Re: A proposal of a consistent set of clear rules and guidelines involving snippets, phases and patches.

[Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1028 bytes --]


On 05-08-2022 05:38, Philip McGrath wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022, at 11:17 PM, Maxime Devos wrote:
>>   * In principle, you can apply a patch from a phase. However, this causes the result of "guix build --source" to not correspond to the actual source code anymore (i.e., it doesn't act as corresponding source anymore), so consider this a last resort for situations such as avoiding causing a world-rebuild for a patch fixing a target-specific bug by making the patching conditional upon target-foo?. If you apply a patch from a phase, make sure that the patch appears in the inputs or native-inputs, such that "guix build --source=all" will include the patch.
> Should we have an option for "guix build --source=all" to also include the Guix "scripts used to control compilation and installation"?

What do you mean with "Guix scripts" here? I don't think Guix has a 
notion of 'scripts' (except stuff like 'wrap-script', but that doesn't 
seem relevant here). Do you mean the phases code?

Greetings,
Maxime.


[-- Attachment #1.1.1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1812 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 929 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 236 bytes --]