Hi,

On 2016-03-29 14:21, ludo@gnu.org wrote:
> rennes@openmailbox.org skribis:
> 
>> +    (arguments
>> +     '(#:configure-flags '("--enable-nss"))) ; instead of OpenSSL.
> 
> If there’s a particular reason for this choice, could you mention it in
> a comment?
> 
>> +    (synopsis "Collection of POSIX-C functions implementing the OAuth 
>> API")
> 
> s/POSIX-C/C/
> 
>> +    (description
>> +     "Liboauth provides functions to escape and encode stings 
>> according to
>                                                            ^^
> *strings
> 
>> +    (license license:gpl2+))) ; distributed under MIT or GPL.
> 
> “MIT” is probably either the Expat or the X11 license.  Please check 
> the
> license texts at:
> 
>   http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Expat
>   http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:X11
> 
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

I Attached the patch corrected.

Clarifying, nss had used instead of openssl because I saw it as an 
option. But in the subsequentes packages OpenSSL is required.

On the other hand I have two questions:
a) Regarding the copyright in the 'Submitting Patches' section I can not 
find the part that describes it.
b) I can use the 'gnu/packages/gnome.scm' file to generate the patch or 
is indifferent ?

Thank you