From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms11 with LMTPS
	id IEEuEaxwGWCPGAAA0tVLHw
	(envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 15:33:00 +0000
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp2 with LMTPS
	id qGrvDKxwGWAdNwAAB5/wlQ
	(envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 15:33:00 +0000
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D7A1940275
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Tue,  2 Feb 2021 15:32:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:51214 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1l6xfj-0006TS-Gc
	for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:32:55 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33908)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <maximedevos@telenet.be>)
 id 1l6xdF-0004Ps-Aj
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:30:21 -0500
Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be ([2a02:1800:120:4::f00:15]:49250)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <maximedevos@telenet.be>)
 id 1l6xdB-0006QV-Rd
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:30:21 -0500
Received: from ptr-bvsjgyjmffd7q9timvx.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be
 ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:aaf1:9810:a0b8:a55d])
 by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp
 id QFWD2401P0mfAB401FWDEs; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:30:13 +0100
Message-ID: <8bc8ed60f7c23f77185def7b0b6b4d8695e77e34.camel@telenet.be>
Subject: Re: Potential security weakness in Guix services
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:30:09 +0100
In-Reply-To: <69968b3a01d872cabdf55a94b6c82d5057e010c9.camel@telenet.be>
References: <YBMybeFOP0VfW6G7@jasmine.lan> <87k0rrls0z.fsf@gnu.org>
 <08F0CD76-DDCF-4CFA-AE8D-5FB165A62B25@lepiller.eu>
 <c7e82df3921fb0eaefb9db798d634f63f6eb0142.camel@telenet.be>
 <87o8h2ehy7.fsf@gnu.org>
 <69968b3a01d872cabdf55a94b6c82d5057e010c9.camel@telenet.be>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2BmPGjaBOUINKIDDJz0h"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21;
 t=1612279813; bh=Rst3fGTJPQBsQ98w1zP1hTiPdMShdS/RYMQP4+lOwI8=;
 h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=JqY42saSMdVC21yhEoEMTGS6GBND4cLkwdzvzk0U8Vqd75XNNLq53POKg4o5HXdYg
 ZUJKJERK8DARAuibeP+/ammOAn9rlIWVI15dUGRvMWPpFxj0NrnUO26f0nzBoXl3OB
 E6ZUi0JbLFLBeE8zxURGHSJ2LMaK593HmlSRFy2XM88jl1qLzYkBwwZV2FaoWt3uVA
 U7+oXeWeKWMpJOq5dWOb4nXUF5PKEIXh/x9KJJPlpdeEj9A0q7hf944We4yjaDo77y
 OLXj+80P3RnM0x+Bv8fFDoulXi4FOlJ8/85nrmNAVaE/KO+lZ9tpfCgHB1U7xzCuAl
 tWWoH2pYYB9aA==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:120:4::f00:15;
 envelope-from=maximedevos@telenet.be; helo=andre.telenet-ops.be
X-Spam_score_int: -27
X-Spam_score: -2.8
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: guix-devel@gnu.org
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.66
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=pass header.d=telenet.be header.s=r21 header.b=JqY42saS;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=telenet.be;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0D7A1940275
X-Spam-Score: -3.66
X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com
X-TUID: +sgAeWFqeoXU


--=-2BmPGjaBOUINKIDDJz0h
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> I'll look into writing a concrete proposal for *at in guile.
> I'll post a link to the guile mailing list message when it has
> been composed and sent.
Here it is:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D46258

I'm not familiar with guile's code base and conventions
and my TODO list is ever-growing, so it could take quite
some time before I get around writing a patch to Guile.
(Or implementing it in pure Scheme + FFI bindings as
a separate library).

Greetings,
Maxime.

--=-2BmPGjaBOUINKIDDJz0h
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYIADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYBlwARccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7oXIAP9nEoVDLGnhBIQLu02HsYIslYDJ
lrnvK4lt94/WrJQ0zAEA1i/FngtDsmv3vTKqVRptB4BwsU7cpAj9qwOXysPt2w4=
=NMEG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-2BmPGjaBOUINKIDDJz0h--