From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40276)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jKnNn-0005ng-2d
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 14:19:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jKnNm-0007tc-5a
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 14:19:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33260)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jKnNl-0007tA-LR
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 14:19:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jKnNl-0007rc-He
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 14:19:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#40264] Linphone: 12-add-belle-sip-v2
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40264.B40264.158602431030135@debbugs.gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 18:18:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: "Raghav Gururajan" <raghavgururajan@disroot.org>
Message-ID: <8920d9146da7bf7f603d67c63450e2f6@disroot.org>
In-Reply-To: <87a73r6tlr.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87a73r6tlr.fsf@gmail.com>
 <e64341a66f09ee99c320b5faa4ff880e@disroot.org>
 <20200402132447.1db0ed9b@scratchpost.org>
 <a3c3755c86e0d25ca3c4672b8865a9ed@disroot.org>
 <03bed573467e87d60306402b6772d4b6@disroot.org>
 <326baae6c830af093895314ee72572a9@disroot.org>
 <20200403133435.57d546b5@scratchpost.org>
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>, Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: 40264@debbugs.gnu.org

> Nice find! Although note that this doesn't exist in the latest code,=0A=
> and that the latest release is nearly 3 years old (2017-07-21). Perhaps=
=0A> we should just try to package the latest master? Their git history=
=0A> suggests many bug fixes, including a memory leak.=0A=0AIn their mail=
 list, one of the dev mentioned that there is going to be a release this =
year. Also, for consistency, I think it is better that we stick to releas=
e tarballs and apply critical patches from master. :-)=0A=0ARegards,=0ARG=
.