From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add detox. Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:30:47 -0500 Message-ID: <87zjf9eq5k.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bnrplsk1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHD4N-0001EH-99 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:29:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHD4E-0002Ei-6o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:28:59 -0400 In-reply-to: <87bnrplsk1.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel Ludovic Courtès writes: > Eric Bavier skribis: > >> + (inputs >> + `(("flex" ,flex) >> + ("popt" ,popt))) > > Flex should be a native input, and I think popt too (it’s a program used > at build time, right?). Both flex and popt are used in this case for their runtime libraries (libfl and libpopt). -- Eric Bavier