From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gnu: Add cairocffi. Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:57:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87zjajwmia.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fvccybt6.fsf@netris.org> <871tnwa9c9.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y21oA-0004td-DJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:57:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y21o3-0000Vm-9d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:57:46 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:52602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y21o3-0000V4-3D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:57:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871tnwa9c9.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:20:38 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: Guix-devel , Federico Beffa Mark H Weaver skribis: > I hope to eventually add some mechanism to detect and/or avoid these > problems in the future. In the meantime, we'll just have to accept that > this problem will occasionally bite us. I don't think it's reasonable > to expect people to do a "make clean-go && make" every time they add a > package. IMO, that cure would be worse than the disease. Right. And yes, we=E2=80=99ll need a better solution. > This commit breaks the Guix build for me. > > Due to complications arising from circular module dependencies, we can't > use 'package-with-python2' from gtk.scm. For now, I suggest moving it > to python.scm, where all other uses of 'package-with-python2' are > currently located. > > If you'd like to understand the reasons, read on (optional). Thanks for catching it, for explaining, and to Federico for the quick fix! Ludo=E2=80=99.