From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Add vsearch. Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 22:50:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87zizz8yn4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <560B14F2.7010103@uq.edu.au> <87612qof9a.fsf@gnu.org> <560F3685.5040102@uq.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiTlX-0007pl-88 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 16:50:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiTlS-0007UI-8Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 16:50:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <560F3685.5040102@uq.edu.au> (Ben Woodcroft's message of "Sat, 3 Oct 2015 11:59:33 +1000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ben Woodcroft Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" Ben Woodcroft skribis: > I also noticed that the license definition was changed from the first > patch applied, removing the public-domain license i.e. from > > + (license (list license:gpl3 license:bsd-2 license:public-domain)))) > > to > > + (license (list license:gpl3 license:bsd-2)))) Right, I did that because the fact that there are public-domain files in it does not have any influence on the license of the combined work. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.