From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tk: Hardcode path to TK_LIBRARY.
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:58:46 +0100
Message-ID: <87ziyjxtkp.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <8def219fd20047742c102943aaf6dea7@openmailbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54225)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZwrTC-0001eK-Nd
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:59:19 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZwrTB-0001Aq-Me
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:59:18 -0500
In-Reply-To: <8def219fd20047742c102943aaf6dea7@openmailbox.org>
	(=?utf-8?B?IuWui+aWh+atpiIncw==?=
	message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:50:17 +0800")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= <iyzsong@openmailbox.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 20889@debbugs.gnu.org

=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 <iyzsong@openmailbox.org> skribis:

> From 6c9ea521e88d36bd1ce990a561477ec0e2950017 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =3D?UTF-8?q?=3DE5=3DAE=3D8B=3DE6=3D96=3D87=3DE6=3DAD=3DA6?=3D <iyzs=
ong@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:31:19 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] tk: Hardcode path to TK_LIBRARY.
>
> Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/20889>.
>
> * gnu/packages/patches/tk-find-library.patch: New patch.
> * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> * gnu/packages/tcl.scm (tk)[source]: Add patch.

[...]

> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/tk-find-library.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +This patch hardcode where Tk found its script library during package
                     ^^          ^^^^
=E2=80=9CThis patch hard-codes the Tk library directory during package
initialization.=E2=80=9D

OK with this change.  Thanks for providing a quick fix!  :-)

Could you commit it in a new =E2=80=98tk-update=E2=80=99 branch?

At the same time, I think we should move tkinter*.so to a separate
output of the Python packages; I think it=E2=80=99s a matter of moving the =
.so
to a separate output, literally.  Would you like to give it a try?

Thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.