From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-ess. Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:17:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87zipph6kx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h9c45jlq.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpl0kxvc.fsf@elephly.net> <87d1mrkw5d.fsf@gnu.org> <20160709193148.GB31432@solar> <87furhn5ee.fsf@gnu.org> <20160710132610.GA11092@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMGTr-0000xy-KS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:17:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMGTn-00067Q-Ui for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:17:14 -0400 In-reply-to: <20160710132610.GA11092@solar> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel Andreas Enge writes: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:39:37PM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote: >> I was thinking about packaging the fonts separately, but I haven't at >> all looked at whether that is a sane thing to do. Do you have a >> particular list of packages where texlive-minimal fails to be sufficient >> to build documentation, or can I generate that list by looking for the >> texlive input? > > Well, instead of packaging fonts separately and adding them back to > texlive-minimal, it should be enough to not delete them in the first place > for the texlive-minimal package... I did not try to replace texlive for all > packages where it is used for building documentation, and do not remember > the list of packages I tried. I think I tried python-matplotlib and lilypond. Right. I'll have a go at it in the next couple of days and report back any progress.