From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add LAPACKE
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 17:52:00 +0200
Message-ID: <87zipggt3z.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <20160708154008.24871-1-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
	<87k2gqhogo.fsf@gnu.org> <878tx5iv7v.fsf@mdc-berlin.de>
	<20160714161541.GA459@solar>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50862)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bOoMe-0000ta-Vn
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:52:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bOoMa-00017v-Ps
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:52:19 -0400
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:24227)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bOoMa-00017e-GU
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:52:16 -0400
In-reply-to: <20160714161541.GA459@solar>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:22:12PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> “guix refresh -l lapack” shows me that 51 packages are affected, which
>> results in a rebuild of 86 dependent packages.  Okay to push to master?
>
> I would do so.

Okay.  I’ve pushed the change.

~~ Ricardo