From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Move gtkglext from gnome to gtk.
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 08:53:14 +0200
Message-ID: <87ziob7up1.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <20160816180104.20832-1-dannym@scratchpost.org>
	<20160816200303.GC20269@jasmine>
	<20160816220916.6ecaf4ed@scratchpost.org>
	<20160816201407.GD20269@jasmine>
	<20160816224000.6bfbbbd5@scratchpost.org>
	<20160817011207.16bb5281@scratchpost.org>
	<20160816234208.GB24066@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51004)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bZuj9-0005ug-Oc
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 02:53:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bZuj4-0005L1-TP
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 02:53:27 -0400
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:24846)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bZuj4-0005Kt-L6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 02:53:22 -0400
In-reply-to: <20160816234208.GB24066@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:12:07AM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
>> I'll send a patch. We can think of what we want to do with it - but at least we can see the extent then.
>
> Oh, I see you already sent it. You'd also need to be sure to move the
> copyright authorship lines around properly. I don't think it's worth all
> the noise, to be honest.

I agree that this seems like a lot of noise for little gain (and in some
cases I think the new location isn’t actually an improvement).

~~ Ricardo