From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Should updaters suggest changes to inputs? Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 17:46:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87zind15po.fsf@elephly.net> References: <8737l52pwd.fsf@elephly.net> <20160912142832.GB24630@macbook42.flashner.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50749) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjTRT-0003kj-OT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:46:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjTRO-0007NA-U7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:46:42 -0400 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:24578) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjTRO-0007MY-Kk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:46:38 -0400 In-reply-to: <20160912142832.GB24630@macbook42.flashner.co.il> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel Efraim Flashner writes: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 03:45:39PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Do you think “guix refresh” should also mention changes to inputs? […] > Like if you were rerunning `guix import foo bar'? Exactly, that’s the idea. The updater has to look up upstream information anyway, so it might as well import and compare the inputs. If the importers produce high-quality expressions, this would be rather useful, I think. ~~ Ricardo