> Incidentally probably we should SHA256 the path to prevent so much
> directory traversal...
>
> In some future (is it near or far?), the source -> compiled function
> needs additional inputs: checksums or timestamps of "build inputs" or
> so, so that when for-syntax definitions (like macros) change, users of
> those definitions will recompile.  That is a harder problem though.
>

Interesting problem!

Thanks again,

Maxim