From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxhL2-0007iZ-Bf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:59:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxhKw-0002w8-R3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:59:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43453) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxhKw-0002vy-Nw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:59:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cxhKw-00043O-HI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:59:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26374: [PATCH] gnu: Move dillo to web.scm. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Kei Kebreau References: <20170405191411.32328-1-kei@openmailbox.org> <87lgreabjk.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87zifu2z34.fsf@openmailbox.org> <874lxwfv6x.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:58:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874lxwfv6x.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:50:14 +0200") Message-ID: <87zifo3oyd.fsf@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 26374-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Kei Kebreau skribis: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> Kei Kebreau writes: >>> >>>> * gnu/packages/dillo.scm: Remove file and move dillo... >>>> * gnu/packages/web.scm: ...here. >>>> * gnu/local.mk: Remove reference to removed file. >>> >>> I think it would be good to have a "web-browsers.scm" to try and keep >>> things organized; web.scm is already a kind of "kitchen sink" for >>> anything web related. What do others think? >>> >>> There are a few other modules that could be moved into a >>> web-browsers.scm as well. >> >> Splitting web.scm into more specific parts could be useful IMO. > > Introducing web-browsers.scm for a start sounds good to me. > > Ludo=E2=80=99. I've opened a new bug (maybe I should have just submitted the new one here...), so if this can be re-examined that would be great. :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAljr/+sACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg3eWxAAva+Y3/k5renl66uKkzlB53AcpkYP0md4xWxV0oggRITEdKe73xNA2RmV Wv3j6LseYJK4uEuyoELrFTITZpYIegRLJVrq+pSYM+G+i1MblBbfwYlCc/hdEwwl jyBddyJF+c+Zvof+g6ZC8dp8YJbCgLLiOX64wXu5f47dA3eGdtSaNYHwuoN0ckyI Wgoh82fBc0Fn+oKpY+LnHbMeUI8/90mI3yYBBwnaVVV+S1/+rc2ce9G5w9DH61cp 3RcCdo09f4TCLnx2EE7u++KVDLFBAB1lfp0FPaJDmp+aBaYSY6T1AXJqJoH2+qnV EDPkm7dOxC53wbO5Zu01Mh7qEou7RmspLackO0d6wPT1mMvU3mic87Az1qYJvPT2 vrk/3ApRDW9ndq5oFBZ7wj6G5VDyBG5NiUyyQp1O7440MbPH/NFfRTxZSdjHv6mS CguJWk2QpHUsXvyO4vr5ut4j/tvpc2zl8cbEygkEzPx3yKOqDqL177GIKy4lhxoC VVeKPxsveimMrtz8xoGK8yqhn3NmxvDyA2tUN5i0+EL1ywBUNV/6nPNslCoVUBjB 6Dh1JankdF5BsV6tj9ae9hoRlfiM3qA9WvDbZxe/SXO/cftdPAZxAjWjkwmr4qGD GlRwyn8LILs4y7N/BrRibBeZtrFOEvabOhz/0RqxdebqFBNK4gs= =pTfH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--