From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44007) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS7Ac-0003xP-TP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:38:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS7AY-00069Z-33 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:38:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS7AX-00069S-VD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:38:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS7AX-00026P-Qb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:38:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#27568] Bigloo update Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43575) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS79R-0003Gl-IG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:36:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS79M-0005U4-TJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:36:53 -0400 Received: from lb1.openmailbox.org ([5.79.108.160]:41306 helo=mail.openmailbox.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS79M-0005SE-KD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:36:48 -0400 From: Kei Kebreau Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:36:33 -0400 Message-ID: <87zicl71oe.fsf@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 27568@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain These two packages should be updated at the same time, as the old hop won't build with the new bigloo. I'd feel better if a bigloo and hop user verified that everything still works as it should. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAllanMEACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg1JGBAAqY3wCdGBCiRMnsIns/qc1rTTvUvjTID25eyVH2cLwHfH1iKnL/L5bA7l HdjEnhaozljrFWhOrY2cfXw2mmaQVh6XrGpqr6iqTsY6LHvWSAH5qp3r7CgQR9eS jTMIT/ou1Nx4SUixtZpWHTRFCB3bIqPRR4RsNDTT8zLsqgBsxpkujx92R8N3PAB2 vZ9i9jVCoaGcLvRUxhG9Dcwr62j+WGTotDybiQFvI1RAwcy06sPbH+6BDNbJIcN0 VWZRtp836KZL5hkEqbn1i1dY33GsC63u4K8gHQaTDoVziYstNJs9CkmbRDchkH5d FL8yq/hUM5+scrdtaevzgzPUyI4kgkreSstpXHNbtPEDdudSVDqRUlGSEAYSCRX3 Iu8sNBDhjITbdHB4VkRcpDRV+BqHx8W2g9CnRPRNQTANUl8RirCiZ8L5AmybHLYy cYd3LA++DK/+P9e84heF8ZVVJxeM+oTcURLV4UvWSQzYgu/N0RkCBLiWTtISZ+9A J2ofqDwCaUwZG8dewPQWjfpJoPsSRGN8dZ6YxhujEnxM1BfKLkQAsYcE0w+u/FZf GBKgrGXN00oH6UIUPMQlWlHDVISWwVwN1GCrFjrXIARan3Dy2trcqBlDyArdz0HG rTA2HbWkku8MLFb7zAKfe3tUOjqqGpvWHtGiMA+pWPFkEr8tPyQ= =EykT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--