From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: 34/44: gnu: Add texlive-fonts-ec. Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:51:54 -0400 Message-ID: <87ziccgrpx.fsf@netris.org> References: <20170709150905.25081.71752@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170709150914.253A620E8E@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87lgnx8e74.fsf@netris.org> <87ziccetuh.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUbuw-0008IN-Mr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:52:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUbur-00076T-QH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:52:14 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:46722) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUbur-00075d-L6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:52:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ziccetuh.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:36:38 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus writes: > This message seems to indicate that: > >> svn: E000110: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'svn://www.tug.or= g/texlive/tags/texlive-2017.1/Master/texmf-dist/fonts/source/jknappen/ec' >> svn: E000110: Unknown hostname 'www.tug.org' > > I=E2=80=99ve tried downloading this directory again and I get the same ha= sh as > before. Maybe it was a temporary problem? You're right. It worked on a second attempt. Given the error message above, I would have expected 'svn' to return a non-zero status code, and for that error to be noticed by Guix before trying to verify the hash. I guess something failed to propagate the error. I looked at the relevant code in Guix, but didn't see anything obviously wrong with it. Oh well, I suppose it doesn't matter much, since checking the hash is the ultimate test. Thanks, Mark