From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35285) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5ind-0000sJ-JX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:42:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5ina-00063M-GB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:42:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44256) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5ina-000631-71 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:42:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e5ina-0003uR-07 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:42:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27549] [PATCH] gnu: vpnc: Update to 0.5.3, revision-550. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87y3s8kybp.fsf@gmail.com> <01350273-2593-618d-a461-b99c1f310265@tobias.gr> <3702cc9a-9066-4e6c-c9be-050e5e6c1ffe@tobias.gr> <87shiaiobt.fsf@gmail.com> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <87shiaiobt.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:35:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87zi8o2l82.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Jelle Licht Cc: 27549@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Jelle, hi Tobias, > Tobias, > > > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > >> Jelle, >> >> On 01/07/17 19:18, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >>> I'd started on packaging those updated vpnc-scripts, [...] >>> I'll dig them up and see how far I got. >> >> Found 'em! If you have some spare time, could you give the attached >> patches a try? They look finished[0], but I don't have a VPN to test. >> >> I hope we can avoid relying on the copy of vpnc-scripts bundled with vpnc: >> >> - the bundled copy still lags behind upstream[1], even in trunk >> - unbundling allows using a stable release of the vpnc client instead >> of a subversion checkout, while still easily updating the scripts >> - and shaves ~50MiB from our openconnect package. > Fair enough, this seems like a good reason to apply your patches ;-). > >> >> Of course, it has to actually work for you first :-) > > Good news! Your patches work, I verified this with my university vpn. > Why are we using this specific versions of the vpnc-scripts? > > What is the problem regarding `wrap-keys' (wrap-program?) exactly? It looks like these patches were dropped. What’s the current status here? Can we apply them or are they no longer needed? -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net