From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: "guix-latest" differs when two users run "guix pull" from same
	commit
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 22:57:17 -0800
Message-ID: <87zi6t1zci.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87ineaewkt.fsf@gmail.com> <87o9o2cikz.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87mv3fvuj7.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50121)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cmmarusich@gmail.com>) id 1eNCb4-000132-F0
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 01:57:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cmmarusich@gmail.com>) id 1eNCb3-0002NX-Ob
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 01:57:22 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87mv3fvuj7.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Tue, 21
	Nov 2017 19:53:16 -0800")
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> writes:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>
>> Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> When two users run "guix pull" using the same commit, two different
>>> versions of "guix-latest" get built.  This surprised me, and in any case
>>> it seems inefficient to build the same version of Guix two times.  Why
>>> do two different derivations get built?
>>
>> That=E2=80=99s a bug!  :-)
>
> I see!  Nice to know my suspicions were correct.

Ludo, did you fix this recently?  Anecdotally, I noticed that the
problem no longer occurs using a recent version of Guix.

=2D-=20
Chris

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8xJI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--