From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46149)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gVFsV-0006km-Ll
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:09:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gVFsS-0004rU-I0
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:09:11 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60335)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gVFsM-0004hc-BV
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:09:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gVFsL-0002Di-W2
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:09:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#33575] [PATCH] guix: lint: Add checker to check if inputs are
	sorted.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33575.B33575.15441881028485@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
References: <20181202074210.31361-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
	<87y3967n3z.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1knpjta.fsf@gmail.com>
	<1f7a7e5589c465c0ad913b388374cf4b@riseup.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:08:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1f7a7e5589c465c0ad913b388374cf4b@riseup.net> (swedebugia's
	message of "Thu, 06 Dec 2018 04:31:28 -0800")
Message-ID: <87zhthmqma.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: swedebugia@riseup.net
Cc: 33575@debbugs.gnu.org, Guix-patches <guix-patches-bounces+swedebugia=riseup.net@gnu.org>

swedebugia@riseup.net writes:

> On 2018-12-06 01:42, Oleg Pykhalov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>=20
>> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>>=20
>> [=E2=80=A6]
>>=20
>>> It=E2=80=99s something we rarely do so we=E2=80=99d get warnings for mo=
st packages.  As
>>> a side effect, people may pay less attention to what =E2=80=98guix lint=
=E2=80=99 says.
>>=20
>> I think this should not stop us from improving a linter and an option
>> like --misc-checks=3Dsort-input,foo,bar could be used for such cases.
>
> I agree with Oleg here.=20
>
> If many packages needs inputs to be sorted lets write a guix lint --sort
> modelling the updater (that is make the changes in the work tree to be
> committed).

+1