From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: .guix-channel: Quote inconsistency Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:31:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhox7xkc.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87tvf89zn3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87imvl8ta9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56765) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEV9M-0001Ns-Qp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 04:33:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEV7C-0000LD-4X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 04:31:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87imvl8ta9.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > I suppose we could do that. And/or we could make it clearer that > the =E2=80=98.guix-channel=E2=80=99 syntax has nothing to do with that of > =E2=80=98channels.scm=E2=80=99, even if it looks similar. I think both would be ideal! =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlyu+1MACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH9p7QgAgLa/MSyCOMBATFNhGKrh7vJSYChqGMucswXVJK24OQvGQFfXzre1+Xah SFrufHWHLw9TF3dWuw5bfZ8Os4uFUp+xkJCl54ZPPZO5YJVjHay2jgnGBb79WBoP Q2844HyCM7H6RvSOMF4w297ebevmbTEsdhNpPf99M1BGsjNNLl+bqoCsmoIrmR9H TNUq2buJfNdDt1RQBZNKNkdp1zcah268qCKAD1VTa3gGqZu2moupTAtSyZb7twoX NQcMlYZm1N5mz7RIpqJnvCloxnUaSmFsyRM9P9SEDdCTcjM9sR74w7dmuN1Pww2E jWV89i//8kIyHy/6UXsKSSWiDPsANg== =z8WW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--