From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] utils: Change critical section terminology to worker
 threads.
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 17:19:24 +0000
Message-ID: <87zhe7o5wj.fsf@cbaines.net>
References: <20200124194406.29638-1-mail@cbaines.net> <87r1zn8m5h.fsf@gnu.org>
 <875zgz87my.fsf@cbaines.net> <87eevjj2p6.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44985)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@cbaines.net>) id 1iwUWP-0006dk-Dc
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:19:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@cbaines.net>) id 1iwUWO-0001hV-AL
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:19:29 -0500
In-reply-to: <87eevjj2p6.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:
>
>> I've gone ahead an pushed these patches now, as it's something I'd like
>> to deploy prior to the Guix days.
>
> Woohoo!  Should we deploy it on berlin?  Let=E2=80=99s synchronize on IRC=
 maybe?

Yep, it would be good. I think it works fine on Bayfront (ignoring the
issues there with running out of disk space, and the build users thing).

It might already be deployed though, as I've just noticed the /output/
requests work on Berlin ([1] for example). That's really good, as it
means I'll be able to pull builds in to the Guix Data Service much more
easily.

1: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/output/4whab5ys3k3r4yn7knc3pfjpwcxqiqxi-maven-re=
solver-provider-3.6.1

Thanks,

Chris

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=3ATo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--