From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBsTT-0001Cc-Cq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:56:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBsTS-0004tS-Bf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:56:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47573) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBsTS-0004tN-6i for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:56:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBsTS-0005ue-4L for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:56:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#39804] [PATCH] gnu: add emacs-exwm-next package (i.e. exwm for emacs-next) Resent-Message-ID: From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87blplqcdd.fsf@web.de> <8736aw8igd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tv3bd6v1.fsf@web.de> <878skn5cys.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87d09ukwnn.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:54:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d09ukwnn.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Mon, 02 Mar 2020 21:19:24 -0500") Message-ID: <87zhcn35rl.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Prikler Cc: Pierre Neidhardt , dario , 39804@debbugs.gnu.org Hello Leo, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Leo Prikler writes: > >> Am Freitag, den 28.02.2020, 09:32 +0100 schrieb Pierre Neidhardt: >>> The `#:emacs` field tells the build system which Emacs package to use >>> to >>> build this package. There may be something that not compatible >>> between >>> our current build system and emacs-next. >>> >>> I've CC'ed Maxim and Leo, they might know more than me. >> This issue should be addressed by #39375, which is currently waiting to >> be pushed to master or staging. > > If we don't hear back from > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39823 in a day or two, I'd > be OK with pushing #39375 to master. There have been no activity or reply on #39823 yet, so feel free to push the workaround discussed earlier (on the master branch is fine). Maxim