From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proxy settings wrt guix daemon
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 10:27:34 +0200
Message-ID: <87zhbm2xhl.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CAEwRq=p-DQgHcmPRb9mYXTJ-WXy7NQVJStuKE_=7jGrgauqMNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87blofyzn0.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAEwRq=rcXmB31Hrrn_iDGO1t+AeOpZiPQ7qzWnyB0j4qC+UgUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87eet8v948.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAEwRq=pNqK+cE+Vq6DxPgT9FCg=4kmsno5D8vSfjM7Fsg5FZLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87r1x3tgi3.fsf@gmail.com> <875zedf0up.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87h7xva8b7.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7xvmeea.fsf@gmail.com>
 <87d08j834r.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54780)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <m.othacehe@gmail.com>) id 1jM6DW-0000Lu-Cg
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 04:37:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <m.othacehe@gmail.com>) id 1jM63e-0001CJ-1j
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 04:27:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87d08j834r.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
 \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
 \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 07 Apr 2020 22:14:28 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>


Hello,

> BTW, if we agree, could you change these strings so we can do a last
> round through the TP and release Thursday/Friday?

Yes, I applied those changes and added proxy support. I'll try to see
how connman is behaving now.

Thanks,

Mathieu