From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49494)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jRJvi-0003b7-VK
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:17:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jRJvi-0003f9-Fw
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:17:02 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41645)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jRJvi-0003eB-2T
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:17:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jRJvh-00020l-T3
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:17:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#40545] [PATCH] services: dnsmasq: Support the --address flag.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40545.B40545.15875794157715@debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87wo6np6hh.fsf@gmx.com>
From: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois@gmx.com>
In-reply-to: <87wo6np6hh.fsf@gmx.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:16:44 +0200
Message-ID: <87zhb3per7.fsf@gmx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: 40545@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi all,

Pierre Langlois writes:

> Hello Guix!
>
> Here's a patch that allows passing the --address flag multiple times to
> dnsmasq. WDYT?

Any comment on this patch? Let me know if I should attempt at adding
some service tests for dnsmasq, that might be useful.

Thanks,
Pierre