From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id Fo2aHSEh4V5LHQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:06:25 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id aOAgGSEh4V7CCwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:06:25 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E40289407C6 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:32844 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jj57G-0002da-ML for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:06:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jj56x-0002NF-5G for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:06:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jj56w-0002uO-Qb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:06:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jj56w-0007ar-IO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#41790] [PATCH] Update emacs-direnv Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41790 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Katherine Cox-Buday Cc: 41790@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 41790-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41790.159181232329130 (code B ref 41790); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:06:02 +0000 Received: (at 41790) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2020 18:05:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35304 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jj56I-0007Zl-F6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:05:23 -0400 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:40853) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jj56G-0007ZT-Gd for 41790@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:05:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72F0A240006; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:05:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <871rmmoq7u.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pna6zy3l.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:05:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pna6zy3l.fsf@gmail.com> (Katherine Cox-Buday's message of "Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:26:06 -0500") Message-ID: <87zh9alrtz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: V5rMabNtg9rl Katherine Cox-Buday writes: > I disagree. If propagated inputs are not for this -- making the package > even functional -- what are they for? IIUC, they are to be used as a last resort, e.g., when the package cannot possibly build without them. Reason is propagated inputs pollute user's profile. E.g., someone may want to use a different direnv, and this propagated input would conflict with their package. In this case, it is reasonable to expect users to install direnv themselves. > But! I am open to discussion. I hear your arguments. I'll let maintainers decide about this, and hopefully clarify what can and cannot be propagated, at least in Emacs packages. This will be useful feedback for future reviews. Meanwhile, you can still provide a patch only bumping emacs-direnv. It is also fine in you prefer to wait. Regards,