bug#44675: guix lint: support for spellchecker or basic grammar

[Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1711 bytes --]

On 2021-05-04, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> skribis:
>
>> From 4e724fbe9815e1c27967b835f08d2259164538ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
>> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:26:45 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH] lint: Add description check for pluralized "This package"
>>
>> Partial fix for: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/44675
>>
>> * guix/lint.scm (check-pluralized-this-package): Add check for
>>   occurances of "This packages" in package descriptions.
>> * tests/lint.scm: Add test.
>
> I had missed this patch, nice!
>
>> +  (define (check-pluralized-this-package description)
>> +    "Check that DESCRIPTION does not contain 'This packages'"
>> +    (if (string-match "This packages" description)
>> +	(list
>> +	 (make-warning package
>> +		       (G_ "description contains 'This packages' but should just be 'This package'")))
>> +	'()))
>
> How about making this ‘check-spelling’ and generalizing a bit so that it
> iterates over a bunch of regexps or strings?
>
> Like:
>
>     (if (any (cut string-contains description <>) patterns)
>          …)
>
> where ‘patterns’ is a list of strings.

Love the idea, but would need some help in implementing!

There have been at least three newly added "This packages" since I
submitted this patch, so wondering if we can at least get the simple
case merged before getting too caught up in all the potential
improvements?


> (Note that ‘string-match’ invokes libc’s regcomp + regexec, so it’s more
> heavyweight than needed here.)

I can probably manage that! (I'll dig up where the simpler suggestion was)


live well,
  vagrant

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]