From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id UGDoJX1U/2Rl1QAAG6o9tA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:55:09 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id UGDoJX1U/2Rl1QAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:55:09 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6220AC5EC for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:55:09 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=NwFaaImb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1694454909; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Ox7P1h3QAMVeBDzIwdOYNyov3Jej9D9YheWjMR8PaSs=; b=XgJx4s+ZFSczpABimejsJe6X6HkRVhAp7xxhH+42c382i+5GoW9CYCIDwZ8q44O2LKRmrA pnxhIIqwypSiumSqB88/aNDM3eu+UtUwzqyf6hGg4q+vlFezGzpT4YR9sPutX3XDVJG6sk RD8QJhQDpn76of4h60gpkD/wWRpZt3yjk5vkU8evsok5C2DXreOhwV+lGcMS3YaXv8vzjk 8LErliIIGSQiTuLf+F8Zmxokd1GdMyQfAOEp5//FD1H6y5qjdZjA/ug44WEWjiyRbPTxYs hTw3F3Cl2UJ//eZ9Xy8EKSYYjYCEDU6cr9Hh4l9sE/Oy5iyvO1tlD1I/X7kZWA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1694454909; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ZmMpZ/XOfdEFyMO7O/w32F/YFp6kB774TZBlTru81TM3q4Cz95KMcs5GZoHZl7hS7J1/4j We9IQbdSnxw3iwUkarUnvQ7ZJJ8ALpTu3Q7um/ageAAGevbKbaazbdgZSWjQiJnP2TIMip Bo1rxCkCmXIR2bvgN3tQ0SAroas9HQbLe49AKJ9qPX4dy2HFjHDA7pKF0TlgLQheOo9ysS 4vjzw5ZBHx2dWpT1WZsjZ+1bhVAJo48w6nRwQ6ci4Gq8MwV253xnbaa3a30c2rJ9UJVle7 0C3yRBxJlRf8CcpCO2OdjLKWRVrRmBxdFk3FZuvCWS9PkTAqBu1Nk7pcCPn1eg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=NwFaaImb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qfl7V-00035s-6B; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 13:54:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qfl7T-00035k-OY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 13:54:43 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qfl7R-0000NC-73; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 13:54:43 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-76dbe1866ecso261548485a.0; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:54:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694454878; x=1695059678; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ox7P1h3QAMVeBDzIwdOYNyov3Jej9D9YheWjMR8PaSs=; b=NwFaaImb6Vo0GH0W6q7uP1OKAn7c7BBUegdpGpiWDhGgs5Jshb/JG0QZamKEGrv9UP KcDCHBPIo9ue3+TKx1d37Ou5jZOEl+AP6sMgBybc6TMzVJh9HnsVoXhAoiWfX6BqJO+z 5UvzOaymx+wYnNAZl8/ntIV5b7kCSRVG9PMSuuWHaITV7nSu+sYlMcqQN17zCAgo4YNT L0bWil54CPwQSTUCYw+HDk12wqr/ibbH73WS3487ihlD1g+EcyBUIsE5drOq7MziiL08 uC+VTrDTouwd8LMPmQJNHOIzgHlMjC9cTe1BE056BKI94kVFOXb/hiwBK1MlT+Ai0S0k bfQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694454878; x=1695059678; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ox7P1h3QAMVeBDzIwdOYNyov3Jej9D9YheWjMR8PaSs=; b=lU9f7Z0IVlY2Ke7IwWlPhdKD9O2JaEAjWVLYIGvXHt/apsVxa9oQhvyBeo0QeERCac XXVuWnPHOq5MtfleTBZ0vRWwe3b0q9RZvR7D3VT2OaKGEI2eavV8LveTeE026v25chUP KIUH1uad0Hw73k2iEcqPa+6Psn82pTUPVQwlXQhi2sR8rULQ8WguIhlBWxZ85+NoKQN1 tlr4DsTmybw1A58aApif94KTqDTUghvacdTFHKalJAOPuNguUMVOh7IPzotUy35VokZh 7/HmpKkp2uhL1EPvRO5vUdNvm110O6rAHU1i1pb76bBoww7M76476tlFmYu3P/T2lgF+ uaCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx+WIDIXi1x1oPkrHeVwqwmg8MCFxY+YyBg0x6ccyO2LUGw5FPc 9HgI5AT32B84WfbFfYrWQ6+q1KbMdtI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGUUYBu1bkqBP/8tSChbz7YuF3L54N5alcW6ZefvpI0pGlkTdlSzHjxr5LOgjeuydWJRH+Log== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2892:b0:76c:b341:15b6 with SMTP id j18-20020a05620a289200b0076cb34115b6mr9373544qkp.40.1694454878340; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-141-150.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.141.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id pj24-20020a05620a1d9800b0076e1e2d6496sm2672789qkn.104.2023.09.11.10.54.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:54:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Simon Tournier Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Ricardo Wurmus , Mathieu Othacehe , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Closing submission incomplete since years? References: <87fu2vjj76.fsf@gnu.org> <864knuk8nk.fsf@gmail.com> <87o7k5i59g.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87jzt04ooe.fsf@gnu.org> <871qf7xadm.fsf@gmail.com> <877coxj6nc.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 13:54:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877coxj6nc.fsf@gmail.com> (Simon Tournier's message of "Mon, 11 Sep 2023 13:23:03 +0200") Message-ID: <87zg1swq77.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::730; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x730.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.65 X-Spam-Score: -8.65 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6220AC5EC X-Migadu-Scanner: mx0.migadu.com X-TUID: v0ze52Q2WRrS Hi Simon, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi Maxim, > > For reference [1]. > > On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 at 18:14, Maxim Cournoyer = wrote: > >> On a related note sometimes we have WIP kind of work that stays on our >> tracker with deeper questions / problems to solve, and I don't think >> it's fair for our reviewers to have these linger on for years on the >> tracker (they take a lot of time to get familiar with, and would then >> require quit more investment to be completed, sometimes with the >> original submitter no longer active in the discussion) -- I think for >> these situations it's fair to close it. An interested person can >> hopefully find these in the archives and resume work on it if they are >> so inclined. > > I am more or less agree. Especially for keeping the tracker > healthy. However, I am missing how =E2=80=9Can interested person can hope= fully > find these in the archives and resume work on it if they are so > inclined.=E2=80=9C > > Maybe we could have another usertags for tagging this case or another > tag. Else, it appears to me unpractical to find these in the archives. > Well, I personally do not even know how or where to start for finding > these. > > Exercise: find the patches that someone pinged their status from the 10 > Years of Guix event and another person then closed. :-) > > Found it? If no, > > Hint 1: someone was me. ;-) > > Found it? If no, > > Hint 2: another person was you. ;-) > > Found it? If no, > > Hint 3: it was about elasticsearch. > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/search?query=3Delasticsearch > > Found it? If no, > > Hint 4: tag =E2=80=99moreinfo=E2=80=99. > > Well, if just marked as done, then it appears to me unpractical to find > these in the archives. If you want to package elasticsearch, know it's not in the Guix as we speak, and see it as the first item when browsing https://issues.guix.gnu.org/search?query=3Delasticsearch, I have some hope that someone could find it. Not to mention search engines, which are also good at this. That said, I get your point. Perhaps a 'rejected' user tag would be useful? I doubt most users would know to use them though... but maybe if it's exposed via Mumi it could be helpful. --=20 Thanks, Maxim