From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id eC0/DC47amUuRwEA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2023 20:59:42 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id eC0/DC47amUuRwEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2023 20:59:42 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FE92437CC for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 20:59:42 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debian.org header.s=1.vagrant.user header.b=bvrSaHwU; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1701460782; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=RW6JdpTftG2y90KENHnI1L+OiBbxmpPK3i7HyXnSNac=; b=Y3sgchgsKVRjdQtL5lpvbCjOuBGU/xcPJC/M0ovNaPejd6m4piM+CnsG/FeuamaGD0cfG6 RdnUfEbY4aksg7caSyo9MqWB+B8sTOlC+Fgpurftega46k+5AbD9grD1KHx4O+CcspKjmF gCqx5U1xn1xyCsL53kRFXDJwvAY3rs+K1G+TlHH1yLU1x11RtSviu8xoDU6vUo9O+a08VD GGq35QISISwmQtdDxZzrQ68eJwIWKpsIa0CyYMMCsN2r56ag9A2VPghzyYQfP0qZawZmiz HTz9lxwHRmawSIKYp67k/bCUWUrDeZ+dG3DU/9gVzfc5d1fR9YFeBjEwR2xNew== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1701460782; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=TfxAVMJPnY7Wmj9JBErw8fJtKC5nS8W2s4t03DKCCF0y4GN/zKltL2x3Vhx0meVOWz6Vpv T5HIkdoFI/3o9Np27rlp+sB98+tq8dlfF0c6dTqNDSN9GoMVm/DuEvuMIR2b5xtT0widDL qum4NwGQrS2gPRiQ8oblooGGllMAdQY7pyDTukWB+O2d40YRrDaVmt3Yovl6ogWI4jUnVf a55gED6Gb3xP8e2GXOAF/pFFsevyFEPL2jVDWNBMonJ33NXlouNZFkTKC6YXRPiYRnj1Ud 3j9fx7vJjerD4Ioe67nKloDI9fOo8nEyMUDjoqa8VInAVHtCkzVviMKXnbaAZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debian.org header.s=1.vagrant.user header.b=bvrSaHwU; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r99fJ-0008Dj-BD; Fri, 01 Dec 2023 14:59:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r99fH-0008DY-1f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2023 14:59:07 -0500 Received: from cascadia.aikidev.net ([2600:3c01:e000:267:0:a171:de7:c]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r99fF-00048R-E4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2023 14:59:06 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:21:7:77:0:50]) (Authenticated sender: vagrant@cascadia.debian.net) by cascadia.aikidev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 196D11AACC; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 11:59:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=debian.org; s=1.vagrant.user; t=1701460741; bh=ZQ9gKJ1LKBewpUhILAGjx5aAWYJcwBKhg2qVRzDMlNY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=bvrSaHwUdMB1EkcQvOdgVHqoDIU3LGkq16N4SQCDA8U9Byku/6BoRziYSSDoxG+8F qQiVWGUkupLruyzw8ekC2g14BMDDbUAl4fU65L1MzHBGUmjm3NjnLhcFutbjI5tmz3 WBZseEcA7Xq/2ImIw9k7ZghTzY61dGE3mVrRFMgysZXQ1uV/8jYXdsLQHaVjoUkGQr y9n7IBjzgAOpc2Zupk5eUBm3vOIcXXoviDezei2WxmAvX6TXqCRiIT78CQqkN5wGIb 9WGjM0U3waarVPapTk4mpCBrCDzSY4LA4K9O50/fnJIdCu56QBDgcGJibpV3oW8AeG 68/3T/c8Uw68A== From: Vagrant Cascadian To: Herman Rimm , 67261@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#67261] [PATCH 3/3] images: Add orangepi-r1-plus-lts image. In-Reply-To: <04c59bffe5d465cb17c0b7e8159642f910ce3f35.1700321434.git.herman@rimm.ee> References: <04c59bffe5d465cb17c0b7e8159642f910ce3f35.1700321434.git.herman@rimm.ee> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 11:58:57 -0800 Message-ID: <87zfytk83i.fsf@wireframe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: none client-ip=2600:3c01:e000:267:0:a171:de7:c; envelope-from=vagrant@debian.org; helo=cascadia.aikidev.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -12.84 X-Spam-Score: -12.84 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1FE92437CC X-TUID: tg0jK2V2ycvY --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On 2023-11-18, Herman Rimm wrote: > * gnu/local.mk: Register image. > * gnu/system/images/orangepi-r1-plus-lts-rk3328.scm: New file. > * gnu/system/install.scm (orangepi-r1-plus-lts-rk3328-installation-os): > New variable. I guess this opens in my mind a larger question of how many images do we want to build out-of-the-box? Building images for every (ARM) board variant possibly supported in guix might not be sustainable in the long term... this could easily become hundreds of images. How big is each image? On the other hand, most of the images for a given architecture will share much of the work between them, as most of the individual packages used to build each image are the same. Not having CI build each and every image is one approach... although then you might not notice when an individual image breaks. live well, vagrant --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCZWo7AQAKCRDcUY/If5cW qimaAP9aoTif+VF1XCq38+ykY6MGJN/4xGuzxcpUM+QvzNWDWwEAxxZdjCVd22wL mNZNJutfxOrUbAKEZttC8cGa50Fx+gY= =WcBu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--