From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id qCihBojdt2XnMwAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:16:56 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id qCihBojdt2XnMwAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:16:56 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=inria.fr header.s=dc header.b=oWOh4ceo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=inria.fr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1706548616; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Ln//KGik2yiO222MxBHt5UKf9wXZHuPlyrkYKYOtH6M=; b=o2Yr2+qrc/psiQ4ezIWkHQwYqWq1kSs1iijXW+/RhiX/kcxLgAD+iWuRe8jn8+vzkrryVL dJjTYcuji2b98Loj914hLgj4k9oEgTebMP29Zb46//1Tit1v9C73SnvIxCopmHgjcYHoup xAMWQh6wdCUC5iC25Q0cpO3Xf3BH4+IREL7HPbKzqtjNK2wB2gGSvIKQ76bHDxieT/o4qR pxvFYb+rz2nlQcD3rG6vogCnDD2GJlt8PrAKlcsoYh00r8ywedVRW8LaFJQxlI0AMqsnq8 unOZ5fit3BrlJH1tpkMe517yyrFBzumu2kEHHCabjmQV3Tdsa1qXSuXNRDiVzw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=inria.fr header.s=dc header.b=oWOh4ceo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=inria.fr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1706548616; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Irg8AKVrPCk1DPIY5PB/lCy+j6N4zrZSiuChfMIbY61jrzu0LT0HTi/CPGQakJCfo5DQgF mZR2kIkWy18ClmVHddAn8TMeDhyVH5Xd3mvWyx5giscY3TDzQY6XqeDqbBeldzePLmHdc8 3TzRFrJxCFTb7+dnNXoMGZd+NaoR3xXsO3mJ+ruFQOnCYF5WfftN6FFGowqlThCx/R3Y/M ojLR4rTsUv6ECHkHsD9XcNqtX9Ty9BMekzGcJUip2GrHins4GZv0luJuXxr7M8P1i0wyih pt8mriUyk7O53AXTfI7t3rMDrrcEAJ9F/hZkNm7KSzzoBRveP20vljcAHyPaBQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A35EA1C909 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:16:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUVF5-0004qV-C9; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:16:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUVF3-0004po-Oe for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:16:17 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUVF1-00021V-7a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:16:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ln//KGik2yiO222MxBHt5UKf9wXZHuPlyrkYKYOtH6M=; b=oWOh4ceoUFcfee4wPXVM9BUy39wDMaWPRBqTFyK3rhAfpW3ykdPzoeK4 1P2koI1w3LwoT0yL8t6xQ29GFiPp2KYM5JVmehmkH0OTgcISYDUPEVz1O UC0/2dvvzQdkMDnzc7LO/5p9qRo70td6uYrqX/qj0FIaZTMikOdB0xQFu w=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,227,1701126000"; d="scan'208";a="78141840" Received: from unknown (HELO ribbon) ([193.50.110.61]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jan 2024 18:16:12 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Timothy Sample Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Preservation of Guix report for 2024-01-26 In-Reply-To: <87a5oq8esg.fsf@ngyro.com> (Timothy Sample's message of "Sat, 27 Jan 2024 18:47:27 -0600") References: <87a5oq8esg.fsf@ngyro.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: =?utf-8?Q?D=C3=A9cadi?= 10 =?utf-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 232 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour de la =?utf-8?Q?Cogn=C3=A9e?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:16:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87zfwokqlg.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.134.164.104; envelope-from=ludovic.courtes@inria.fr; helo=mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.71 X-Spam-Score: -6.71 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A35EA1C909 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: yhjmuNKizVTN Hi Timothy! Timothy Sample skribis: > The permalink is https://ngyro.com/pog-reports/2024-01-26, but you can > link to the latest report, too: https://ngyro.com/pog-reports/latest/. Yay! > New in this edition is checking for Subversion sources and > bzip2-compressed tarballs. Subversion is well covered (98.5%), since it > is basically asking, =E2=80=9Cis TeX Live in SWH?=E2=80=9D. The bzip2 so= urces are > similar to other compressed tarballs. Thumbs up on bzip2 support! We should update Disarchive in Guix but perhaps that=E2=80=99s already in your pipeline? We=E2=80=99ll also have t= o sync the disarchive.guix.gnu.org with ngyro.com. How did you implement the Subversion check? Until the recent addition of =E2=80=98nar-sha256=E2=80=99 ExtIDs=C2=B9, my = understanding is that there was no way to check whether a Subversion revision (and actually, a specific sub-directory checkout) was in SWH. =C2=B9 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68741 > Some of these (I didn=E2=80=99t check them all) are in SWH as content r= ather > than directories. That=E2=80=99s kinda good, because Guix knows how to= get > them, but also kinda mysterious. I=E2=80=99ve asked swh-devel about it. > Depending on the answer, I might have to adapt the checks to deal with > the possibility of SWH having the tarball rather than its contents. > In fact, that might be an improvement either way, but it muddies the > data model quite a bit. Back in the day, they told me that tarballs can sometimes be ingested, for instance if they are committed to a VCS repo (that=E2=80=99s why our fallback code tries that as well). Maybe that=E2=80=99s what happened? > The short-term road map for this is to send the historical sources to > SWH and fix the Ruby gems, and then make a new report. So expect a > minor update with much better numbers soon-ish. Awesome. > The long-term road map is to make it work like an archive. It will run > continuously and store *all* Guix sources. To make this easy data-wise, > it will only store what=E2=80=99s not covered by SWH. By =E2=80=9Cit=E2=80=9D, you mean the Disarchive DB? Thanks for the exciting news! Ludo=E2=80=99.