From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id mGVNLXEyKGdTWQAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 02:33:21 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id mGVNLXEyKGdTWQAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 03:33:21 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=EUFXfor0; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=JIHtgVYQ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1730687601; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jdzdFtSKqgbxHHnkdZ07zt8teHtTampum0GtjOL0S3gf/rMiBGaECWYSdBqZ42GSCqQBue YxL7vMM2+0AnBHBPdZS3msITkgzohg/Dl9063j4XRJXDoY6trCVz26HgRNB9Tj+ZpOG4jg BVQcgGTNu62FepyQs9xjzeMud4EZUXluGOrOaj+ACL4QOXXTU24hUR0hn76A6iggjNiWBe jok7LoMMs21bjKBKrYiJ0NNClXEsQI7udzasH0h96JMJtkehsHlZrswhSotwoeCOPdZEpt 5/Mu1ZiSWTP5/hPLFzIm/LGCVtbOL/Eej+Akq4AMhAvrgR/J2uqtQkoUo+KHAw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=EUFXfor0; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=JIHtgVYQ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1730687601; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=+4b8TbsDsmfJt6WHM6NJe/cTgG2EBawQPdxP4rtah7E=; b=ROdP7TqaRrWFy3wgHarbDYTCFbkchRQcyWGVdhA4GH9ysvri3gFmH50+eiXcnsijKidzeb /9cSZSHNnfswcCyUjbTGG/LN15gFim1WijkjB+5/GVhVUfeZAiVT/SXPJGUGJSTEvlMvr8 pD/UTaja+ZpKE43Fq7PKjWuyOSLkQV8fjwxqsVcPzb9fj7YC2EXxkQ6BH/heREC3gIQRy/ iueOHOlp5urwK1wFXCXh2QyiNnGjiqtmN4EULi4ZuBTtiwxgw5CmvqSsUPpxAnf+vG8U+z ZgXA1kpUm5n9MFrfKgERB8Iu/NNEEE0z3U3NY/2E8+hd4xlbLuTWWrI4SgvN1A== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45C9E18497 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 03:33:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t7mts-00017j-VX; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 21:33:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t7mtq-00017Y-QW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 21:33:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t7mtq-0007Tj-I0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 21:33:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=+4b8TbsDsmfJt6WHM6NJe/cTgG2EBawQPdxP4rtah7E=; b=EUFXfor0GFxD2uT2b2mtl4uIU9ddiK5N4V8o1FZo/w5kslO31Qc6seSQ1QT7CpQ0ZZ8nbOqWC0rzY/7JJBIuDW21zHTCnkhwNke6A+cMvcDER1pJvIJx7/edT/iCsk+7yFnnNQj+NR5eguvg2eMvxS7lHnfnn5bJLqW9bMl6Kmq7r4CDW6/L6xbCo+TB4x2l5RsA1CU8U71ljCzr8UwY+89dNDacJM5OuDSt3tWtg4o4AUMdqoIzmnc8Yn9U1oaD0TVV1vdVYWXbeobn2b18cofM+HeM2Kk8HA3OEZTvxcQomj1L0L7gCYno2k8QkFmEpuZEStLn8mOUlZ+xwRRwag==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t7mtq-0007Re-Bm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 21:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: John Kehayias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 02:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Efraim Flashner Cc: Josselin Poiret , Z572 , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.173068756628603 (code B ref 73288); Mon, 04 Nov 2024 02:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2024 02:32:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36565 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t7mtZ-0007RF-DE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 21:32:45 -0500 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]:34425) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t7mtW-0007R7-9G for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2024 21:32:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1730687556; x=1730946756; bh=+4b8TbsDsmfJt6WHM6NJe/cTgG2EBawQPdxP4rtah7E=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=JIHtgVYQ1LMKB0kKGVdUXS1x/6Wa/1jhxVhIhYaVYJugkkd0CoPnfFdC4ucZ2QoA8 TMbxkyms1Ph8v41iYXeBFKt2xdhrzsMhG1r8TV+5sl6TW811RAJXIylRoYYMUuDj04 vbe33ilzPgtYpPCjFOiFfTpn2EhedorUoZvfTE1ai6MPg1YiHPpjQPIaxDBmCMjF/q URHpy+UzoGihtdncptoGS5x0G7+W9oc0uoi+mR3fB7HTow5ZDn3ResF0CKqj2eBG+T U1HVV9/y8xDPIxYS2iqMgSs4eP7w+BUoKBUV1/J2cFslEhG2pCFJc0VRAA+MgqzBEU txC4JxS5Yeapw== Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 02:32:31 +0000 Message-ID: <87zfmfafv6.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: ebab285e9d4fda3748caf92b29fffd2b89670287 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: John Kehayias X-ACL-Warn: , John Kehayias via Guix-patches From: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 2.05 X-Spam-Score: 2.05 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 45C9E18497 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: F5iGpzKtVfMu Hi all, On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 03:02 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 06:04:08PM +0800, Z572 wrote: >> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: >> >> > Hello Guix, >> > >> > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for >> > merging. Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is >> > tracked at . There is an update to >> > add NVK support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and >> > push (and rebase to get more fixes from master). >> > >> > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as >> > well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out >> > on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. >> > >> > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to catch >> > up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of >> > other blockers. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > John >> >> maybe is time to merge? >> >> see >> ci have x86_64-linux 96.3%, i686-linux 87.7%, powerpc64le-linux 85= .5% >> bordeaux have x86_64-linux 91.5%, i686-linux 77.8%, armhf-linux >> 79.4%, aarch64-linux 89.0%. >> >> Is there anything else in the way? > > Comparing them against master and against each other: > x86_64: comparable on ci, slight regression on bordeaux > i686: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (91.8 -> 77.8) > aarch64: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (97.0 -> 89.0) > armhf: slight regression on bordeaux > ppc64le: comparable on ci and bordeaux > riscv64: regression on bordeaux (62.0 -> 28.2) > > I feel like bordeaux will catch-up fairly quickly post merge. However, > we do now have the regression page for bordeaux of master vs > mesa-updates: > > > However, after spot-checking a few of them to see if there are > substitutes (including gnome and openjdk) it looks like it probably just > needs to be sent through again. > > It looks okay to me I had been keeping a close eye some weeks ago during the initial batch of p= atches I pushed and I also think everything looks good. I was just waiting = for non-x86 substitute coverage which seems to finally be there as noted ab= ove after waiting for other branches and recent Berlin issues. I have been = running my system on this branch for a couple weeks as well. However, the other day on IRC there was a comment about (if I remember) Swa= y hardware acceleration needing newer libva...? I think it was Josselin (cc= 'ed); apologies if I misremembered as I was traveling. Is that a blocker? If so, it would be good to have that update (plus likely= yet another mesa version bump) so substitutes can be rebuilt. But I also d= on't want to hold up any other branches longer than necessary as this has a= lready been waiting for some weeks. John