From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Need of daemon for "guix package" subcommands Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:30:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87y5adeotk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201306131914.38521.andreas@enge.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41427) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnEEt-0001s4-3Q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:35:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnEEs-0006TS-6X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:35:23 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:36896) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnEEs-0006TH-0Q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:35:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201306131914.38521.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:14:38 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > I noticed that > guix package --roll-back > does not work without a daemon running. Could this be changed? In theory yes, but in practice that=E2=80=99d require twisting the code for= what looks to me like an easily worked around corner case. How strongly do you feel about it? Lazy Ludo=E2=80=99.