From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Troubles with install image Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:01:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87y4vrp2v3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wqbf4cao.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87r41mml3g.fsf@gnu.org> <87fvi2f4xo.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87fvi1ifr9.fsf@gnu.org> <878uns9apg.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <874mygdk1h.fsf@gnu.org> <87silzze39.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33951) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X82Ab-0004md-GT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 03:01:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X82AV-0008QB-IR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 03:01:29 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:60931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X82AV-0008Q6-Bs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 03:01:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87silzze39.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (David Thompson's message of "Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:48:42 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: David Thompson Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org David Thompson skribis: > ext2fs_check_if_mount: Can't check if filesystem is mounted due to > missing mtab file when determining whether /dev/sdb1 is mounted. > fsck.ext4: No such device or address while trying to open /dev/sdb1 > Possibily non-existent or swap device? > 'fsck.ext4' exited with code 8 on /dev/sdb1 It could be that (1) it=E2=80=99s not called that way, or (2) additional ke= rnel modules need to be loaded so that the device is visible. For (1), you could try using a partition label rather than the actual device name in the =E2=80=98file-system=E2=80=99 declaration. For (2), you could check in the kernel log whether sdb is detected. Ludo=E2=80=99.