From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: gnu: Have lua-5.1 compile a .so Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:09:16 -0500 Message-ID: <87y4tr13ab.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20140910223135.GF31169@luwin.ulrar.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRr0W-0006n1-NF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:09:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRr0S-0001Y0-6b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:09:00 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]:34376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRr0S-0001XL-1c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:08:56 -0400 Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id uq10so21000igb.14 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:08:55 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <20140910223135.GF31169@luwin.ulrar.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: lemonnierk@ulrar.net Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org lemonnierk@ulrar.net writes: > --- a/gnu/packages/lua.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/lua.scm > @@ -75,7 +75,9 @@ for configuration, scripting, and rapid prototyping.") > (uri (string-append "http://www.lua.org/ftp/lua-" > version ".tar.gz")) > (sha256 > - (base32 "0cskd4w0g6rdm2q8q3i4n1h3j8kylhs3rq8mxwl9vwlmlxbgqh16")))))) > + (base32 "0cskd4w0g6rdm2q8q3i4n1h3j8kylhs3rq8mxwl9vwlmlxbgqh16")) > + (patches (list (search-patch "lua51-liblua-so.patch"))) > + (patch-flags '("-p1")))))) Is the 'patch-flags' really necessary here? I believe the default is to use -p1. -- Eric Bavier Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html