From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add samtools Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:19:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87y4qcj728.fsf@mango.localdomain> References: <878uie6pd9.fsf@gnu.org> <87k31wysbs.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzhvE-0000S1-8j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 03:19:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xzhv8-0000nU-Ud for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 03:19:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k31wysbs.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Mark H Weaver writes: > This built successfully on x86_64, but on i686 its test suite shows 87 > failures ("SAM files differ"). See: > > http://hydra.gnu.org/build/173180 > http://hydra.gnu.org/build/173180/log/raw Apparently, these 87 test failures on non-64-bit architectures are upstream problems with the test data for version 1.1. According to the developers the test data does not actually comply with the SAM specs, see and the linked discussion. This has been fixed in later commits, but there hasn't been a new release yet. Can we disable the test suite for certain architectures? Or would they have to be disabled completely?