From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: GSoC project ideas Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:13:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87y4njl1li.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bnkjgvol.fsf@gnu.org> <87vbio7h7s.fsf@gnu.org> <87sidr8q5o.fsf@fsf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46360) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YROTZ-0007aa-AS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:13:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YROTV-0000tR-1k for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:13:21 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40564) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YROTU-0000tN-Uf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:13:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87sidr8q5o.fsf@fsf.org> (David Thompson's message of "Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:01:07 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: David Thompson Cc: Guix-devel David Thompson skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> "Thompson, David" skribis: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s w= rote: >>>> >>>> Any other ideas come to mind? >>> >>> How about adding container support to 'guix system'? There are some >>> good problems to be solved there. >> >> What do you have in mind exactly? (=E2=80=9CContainer=E2=80=9D is often= used with >> subtly different meanings it seems.) > > I mean container in the sense that Docker[0] has popularized. Instead > of deploying a system on a VM, you could deploy it to a "container" on a > host system, which isolates the system via Linux's cgroups and kernel > namespaces. Nix supports installing systems in these sorts of > containers via systemd-nspawn. We'd have to write our own tool, as > discussed in a thread a few months back. > > Does this help? Yes, thanks for clarifying. It sounds like a good idea. Could you write a few lines on this to add to the GSoC ideas page? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.