From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= <iyzsong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Reproducible profiles
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 20:02:53 +0800
Message-ID: <87y4kgom4y.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87pp62iqmn.fsf@fsf.org> <87egmgu609.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87a8x4dabt.fsf@gmail.com> <87wq0780nd.fsf@fsf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48578)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@gmail.com>) id 1Yvlea-0003Qa-SW
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:02:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@gmail.com>) id 1YvleX-0006J2-O7
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:02:16 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]:33846)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@gmail.com>) id 1YvleX-0006In-Hu
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 08:02:13 -0400
Received: by pabru16 with SMTP id ru16so18255040pab.1
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 05:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87wq0780nd.fsf@fsf.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:

> =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 <iyzsong@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> +1 for return 'manifest', in a same way as 'operating-system'.
>> And how about use specification instead of package, so I can:
>>
>>   (manifest
>>     (map package-specification->manifest-entry
>>          '("emacs"
>>            "font-adobe-source-han-sans:cn")))
>
> I don't like that idea because the text specification is just a syntax
> for shell users.  In Scheme, we can use the package objects directly
> rather than encode them as strings.
Well, by this way, I don't need to figure out which modules packages
belong to.

It works great, thanks!