From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] xlockmore: Fix URLs and update to 5.46
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:33:54 +0100
Message-ID: <87y4cd7al9.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <cover.1451114884.git.leo@famulari.name>
	<877fk164d8.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48922)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1aDsXQ-000106-8g
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:34:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1aDsXN-0004qm-3u
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:34:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <877fk164d8.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Sat,
	26 Dec 2015 08:44:35 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:

> I don=E2=80=99t think it=E2=80=99s necessary here, though, as the patch l=
ooks fine to
> me.

Seconded.

In general, I think it=E2=80=99s fine to to minor upgrades of leaf packages
directly (see =E2=80=98HACKING=E2=80=99.)

Ludo=E2=80=99.