From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add teensy-loader-cli.
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 10:31:08 +0200
Message-ID: <87y46m3c8j.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1464535684-5751-1-git-send-email-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com>
	<87y46ofyvo.fsf@gnu.org> <574FEF7D.5010200@crazy-compilers.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49970)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1b8kVg-0007XT-GM
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 04:31:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1b8kVc-00051S-7s
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 04:31:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <574FEF7D.5010200@crazy-compilers.com> (Hartmut Goebel's message
	of "Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:34:05 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> skribis:

> Am 01.06.2016 um 22:16 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:

[...]

>> There=E2=80=99s a .elf file in the source:
>> =E2=80=A6 and a bunch of .hex files with no corresponding source, AFAICS.
>
> Yes, these are examples for flashable files contained in the original
> source. But these are not put into the package.
>
>> Could you remove them in a =E2=80=98snippet=E2=80=99?
>
> May I ask, why this is necessary?

We want to guarantee a couple of things:

  1. That everything is built from source; this is apparently the case
     but removing those binaries makes it obvious.

  2. That the source as returned by =E2=80=98guix build -S=E2=80=99 is excl=
usively
     source code.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.