From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add allegro. Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:54:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87y44wdr1f.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20160719205719.20769-1-rekado@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxZR-0004n0-5Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:54:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxZM-0001g2-4h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:54:16 -0400 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:24010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxZL-0001fO-Ru for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:54:12 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: "Thompson, David" Cc: guix-devel Thompson, David writes: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> * gnu/packages/game-development.scm (allegro): New variable. >> --- >> gnu/packages/game-development.scm | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/gnu/packages/game-development.scm b/gnu/packages/game-development.scm >> index b11285a..03623aa 100644 >> --- a/gnu/packages/game-development.scm >> +++ b/gnu/packages/game-development.scm >> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ >> ;;; Copyright © 2015, 2016 David Thompson >> ;;; Copyright © 2016 Efraim Flashner >> ;;; Copyright © 2016 Kei Kebreau >> +;;; Copyright © 2016 Ricardo Wurmus >> ;;; >> ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. >> ;;; >> @@ -342,6 +343,46 @@ etc.") >> (home-page "http://liballeg.org") >> (license license:giftware))) >> >> +(define-public allegro > > Shouldn't this be allegro-5 since there is already an allegro-4? I want the “allegro” variable to simply hold the latest version of allegro. If ever there’s a need to clarify (e.g. because we need to keep around the last of the 5.x series when 6.x comes out) we can change the name then. As far as I can see that’s been our approach for some other packages, too, most prominently “python”. ~~ Ricardo