From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: Re: [GSoC update] Npm & guix Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:33:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87y44qost7.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43321) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRe9O-0003y0-Su for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:34:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRe9K-0008E4-GH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:34:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Jelle Licht's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2016 03:06:52 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jelle Licht Cc: guix-devel Jelle Licht writes: > On Ludo's advice, I snarfed Ricardo's recursive importer and bolted it on= my npm > importer. After leaving the importer running for a quite some hours (and = making > it more robust in the face of inconsistent npm information), it turns out= that > jQuery has a direct or indirect dependcy on about everything. We are talk= ing > pretty much all of the build systems, all of the testing frameworks and a= ll of > the test runners. Literally thousands of packages, and multiple (conflict= ing) > versions of most. Have you asked the jQuery developers for their view on the number of dependencies you found and some of the conflicts you see? Thanks for your great effort! Greetings, Jan --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.nl= =20=20