Re: [PATCH 0/1] Perl 5.24.0 update

[Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:43:57PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> And the perl-no-build-time patch deactivated the code that embedded the
>> compilation timestamp that is normally printed by `perl -V`. Perl 5.24.0
>> can take this value from the macro PERL_BUILD_DATE [2], so I removed the
>> old patch and added perl-reproducible-build-date.patch.
>> 
>> I don't love this patch... we could instead do something like what
>> happens in the Erlang package. There we instead get SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
>> from the environment and do some format string transformations to make a
>> pretty date string.
>
> We could also just keep the perl-no-build-time patch in place. There is
> not much point in doing work just to make `perl -V` print a nonsense
> date (Unix epoch) IMO.

What you sent looks good.  It is important to let “perl -V” print a date
(even if it is useless) to avoid breaking third-party software that
expects a date to be printed.

Your patch to just define the date as the epoch seems fine to me.

~~ Ricardo