From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 42/42] gnu: Add darcs.
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:12:33 +0000
Message-ID: <87y42j569q.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
References: <20160918161022.26135-1-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<20160918161022.26135-42-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<20160921014449.GA18022@jasmine> <20160923001232.GD12170@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57325)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bnMXa-0003FS-Ut
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 05:13:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bnMXX-0007G8-FS
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 05:13:06 -0400
Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:34641)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bnMXX-0007EU-80
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 05:13:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160923001232.GD12170@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 09:44:49PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 04:10:22PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
>> > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (darcs): New variable.
>
> I just pushed most of the patches in this series, except for darcs, with
> the changes I suggested.

Many thanks!

> I did not push the darcs patch itself yet. I will look into that later
> today.
>
> I also did not push ghc-directory@1.2.2.0 because it is unused.
>

Okay.

I think in darcs the configure flags can be shortened to 2 lines if the
-f instead of --flag is used, as explained on the hackage page, but this
is just cosmetic.
I also think for reference we should keep the versions of packages it
needs as they are so many. On the other hand hackage keeps the list of
dependencies and versions of those, so... should I send a patch removing
these comments?
-- 
              ng0