From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix GCJ on armhf. Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 10:30:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87y405z2uz.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20161125213515.14677-1-rekado@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAvnT-0002xh-TD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 04:30:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAvnQ-0006Vn-PQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 04:30:55 -0500 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:21466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAvnQ-0006Uq-H6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 04:30:52 -0500 In-reply-to: <20161125213515.14677-1-rekado@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi Guix, > > with (a poorly formatted variant of) the attached patch I've built GCJ > successfully in an ARM virtual machine. Building GCJ took about four days. I > tested GCJ by building "ant", which seemed to have worked fine. > > ~~ Ricardo > > Ricardo Wurmus (1): > gnu: gcj: Fix build on armhf. > > gnu/local.mk | 1 + > gnu/packages/gcc.scm | 14 +++++++++++++ > gnu/packages/patches/gcj-arm-mode.patch | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/gcj-arm-mode.patch Pushed to master with dbf8f84f15fb80fa41caeed073460853083e48d3. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC http://elephly.net