From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45391) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUwQP-0004gY-U1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:46:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUwQM-0001hV-3e for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:46:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59741) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUwQM-0001hO-0F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:46:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUwQL-00031z-RK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:46:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#27635] [PATCH] gnu: emacs: Build with imagemagick support. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87d199j5tm.fsf@gmail.com> <874luk60jr.fsf@gnu.org> <8fa36bff.AEEANLsStFwAAAAAAAAAAAOzWv8AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZZNy9@mailjet.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:44:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8fa36bff.AEEANLsStFwAAAAAAAAAAAOzWv8AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZZNy9@mailjet.com> (Arun Isaac's message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:42:04 +0530") Message-ID: <87y3rvvxqv.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: Alex Vong , 27635@debbugs.gnu.org Arun Isaac skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Thoughts? > > Some preliminary thoughts: > > `guix size emacs' lists cups, cups-minimal, ghostscript and > ghostscript-with-cups as dependencies. Can't we do with just cups and > ghostscript, or just cups-minimal and ghostscript? > > Also, there are two builds (different hashes) of cairo-1.14.8 listed. > > Is it acceptable to build gtk+ with cups-minimal, instead of cups? I=E2=80=99m not sure, but I guess not (cups depends on cups-filters, which depends on cups-minimal IIRC). I suggest looking at =E2=80=9Cguix graph -t references emacs=E2=80=9D to ge= t an idea of where things come from. Stripping a dependency graph can be tricky! Ludo=E2=80=99.