From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#28610: tcsh 6.20.00 testsuite: 68 failed Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:55:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87y3oyuefv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mv5erjp8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxq9W-0008NP-TI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 03:56:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxq9S-0002qt-0i for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 03:56:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxq9R-0002qa-T5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 03:56:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dxq9R-0005zg-LV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 03:56:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (drashne@protonmail.com's message of "Thu, 28 Sep 2017 22:27:18 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Drashne Cc: "28610@debbugs.gnu.org" <28610@debbugs.gnu.org> Hello, Drashne skribis: > Thank you for looking in to this. > > The 'testsuite.log' file you requested is attached. > > I noticed that in the "Detailed failed tests" section, it has: > > 68. commands.at:893: testing nice ... > ./commands.at:896: tcsh -f -c 'nice set var=3D1; echo $?var' > --- /dev/null 2017-09-22 17:50:11.102758003 +0000 > +++ /tmp/guix-build-tcsh-6.20.00.drv-0/tcsh-6.20.00/testsuite.dir/at-gr= oups/68/stderr 2017-09-29 01:59:18.591958887 +0000 > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ > +setpriority: Permission denied. > 68. commands.at:893: 68. nice (commands.at:893): FAILED (commands.at:89= 6) > > So at first glance the failure appears to be caused by "setpriority: Perm= ission denied" Per setpriority(2), the only was this can happen is if we=E2=80=99re trying= to set a nice value lower than the current one: EACCES The caller attempted to set a lower nice value (i.e., a higher p= rocess priority), but did not have the required privilege (on Linux: did not have the CAP_SYS_NICE c= apability). Could it be that you=E2=80=99re running the daemon with =E2=80=9Cnice guix-= daemon =E2=80=A6=E2=80=9D or something like that? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.