From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eK5Q4-0008U1-Ly for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:41:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eK5Py-0004KN-Ti for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:41:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eK5Py-0004KJ-Pk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:41:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eK5Py-0006gg-FW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:41:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29406] [PATCH core-updates]: Add selected upstream fixes for glibc 2.26. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87mv3eove6.fsf@fastmail.com> <20171123145702.GA5794@jasmine.lan> <20171127213004.GA22910@jasmine.lan> <87bmjnyyaa.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ski3cmj.fsf@gnu.org> <878teqzhpa.fsf@fastmail.com> <87r2sixueu.fsf@gnu.org> <87609uz5ln.fsf@fastmail.com> <87lgiqrub7.fsf@gnu.org> <20171128214204.GC16214@jasmine.lan> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:40:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20171128214204.GC16214@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:42:04 -0500") Message-ID: <87y3mpqbri.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 29406-done@debbugs.gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:02:04PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Marius Bakke skribis: >>=20 >> > Typical: The 2.26 branch just got 10 new commits that look important: >> > >> > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=3Dglibc.git;a=3Dshortlog;h=3Drefs/heads/= release/2.26/master >> > >> > Especially the malloc() fixes. Should we pick them while we still have >> > time, or update the snapshot? >>=20 >> Your call! :-) >>=20 >> Maybe we can focus on building more on the branch, and revisit this >> issue when we=E2=80=99re ready to build the whole branch. (Or are we re= ady >> yet?) >>=20 >> WDYT? > > I think there's not much to do without at least some of the glibc > patches, because icu4c fails to build. The glibc tarball I uploaded does fix icu4c, doesn=E2=80=99t it? Anyway I=E2=80=99m happy to update another tarball when you want! Ludo=E2=80=99.