From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUa29-0004SD-De for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 11:56:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUa26-0003ku-Bf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 11:56:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46129) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUa26-0003kU-8E for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 11:56:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fUa25-0002ls-TY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 11:56:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#31548] [PATCH] gnu: Add sbcl-stumpwm-checkout. Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: <20180522084332.30409-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <87603ezfqn.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0xkxbak.fsf@gmail.com> <871sdz3egs.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaaimljw.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 18:55:41 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87vaaimljw.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:08:35 +0200") Message-ID: <87y3fd9zlu.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 31548@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Ludovic, Apologies for a long reply. ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: [=E2=80=A6] >> In that case, I=E2=80=99d suggest changing the =E2=80=9Cname=E2=80=9D fi= eld to =E2=80=9Cstumpwm-next=E2=80=9D as >> we did a few times in the past, so that by default, people still get the >> official release. Changing =E2=80=9Cname=E2=80=9D field unfortunatelly breaks the build. I d= idn't investigate a reason yet and I don't want to push without changing =E2=80=9Cname=E2=80=9D field because users will install the =E2=80=9Cstumpw= m-next=E2=80=9D by default. > That and a comment summarizing what you wrote above and you can go ahead! Thanks, Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc+OyAXw1EaDPCmAPckbhHGm3lWkFAlsmhH0ACgkQckbhHGm3 lWmV1hAApsiwxtb/p3Drds0U42BzrqvHtjkfzgJy2gzSKJ/H2VtIcif7cJOTQcEt bVk+lSlQMKPerfVf3SjY4GD3Ve79c8UbyqRzNGI9/ZsKZIRcbD8Z5vO0Vxess6VT FxP5l+Gy5RD2FSDwXPgf6/RMDrnmqgmixHN7JVUMjwa1G6gpvTxSzZSND5qyVyDV LLVi5TVeNh9nsWkUdaU3kMue2l4yDWwQTnFMIcwtAHr1zKm+TAnuZyOoCXX0z6B+ ju5K7XeNiIQ27BUx5moCHhny5SZTW02rWEPmSdeoq9IbltzKTxUS8sElrEfmRJWD STTIKHc8NAx3lq2jel4uGXUIy6e64kdq808jN53j9n73PoU2qnu8sDyF/JGkRwZt Uz2FHn3kcHHgvLY7xEz2EfTWNCuKkhcfzlLN7Tj61hVgJCis0L0kAgSAb01SI4xJ +MYklPLpIgxVOPyuYCL5hWMXU88BIHQPmN29jN5Y9YB9d+akkJ+v5sDMh6HQ3Jpm ak88tAZV1Q/UyHjycEUxwrR7I/8/Qor/PD2oJ2UbWe4q2sXfSk+W5fxDDjw/9kPG COjTPaxgN93GVrDAkJ5AaVuWAXbsQdJ/B55sSS/flRRkxl7gr2MXqzvW8xEbuzIy Swi4av4UbJbOmspz3wiKAHimHzRA7d1UiB4PHF75D7BPkJ8W0MA= =9bc9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--