Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org> writes:

[...]

>> I guess that ‘guix weather’ checks the presence of substitutes for a
>> current derivation of a package definition, so if in the same
>> environment ‘guix weather’ tells that a substitute is available and
>> ‘guix package’ doesn't fetch it, it sounds fishy no?
>
> Yes.  I cannot see the derivation in question, though, so I don’t
> understand why “guix weather” would claim that a substitute exists.
>
> I haven’t begun investigating this yet.  I’m probably overlooking
> something obvious.

do you think I should file a bug report or should I wait for more
investigation in this list?

Thanks!
Giovanni

[...]

-- 
Giovanni Biscuolo

Xelera IT Infrastructures