From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52459) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5a7k-0002OQ-Qw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:03:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5a7j-0004pK-U6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:03:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34181) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5a7j-0004oj-C5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:03:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h5a7j-0007Fk-0q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:03:03 -0400 Subject: [bug#34824] [PATCH staging] libdrm/Mesa Meson patch series Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <20190312141615.2d96bb7d@mykolab.com> References: <20190312141615.2d96bb7d@mykolab.com> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 19:01:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87y35d8jmw.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Rutger Helling , 34824@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Rutger Helling writes: > Hey Guix, > > this patch series changes libdrm and Mesa to use Meson. > > A few notes to go along with the patches: > > Patch #1: Libdrm on Github mentions that Autotools is the legacy build > system for libdrm, so it seems better to change this to use Meson. > Patch #2: Mesa is gonna drop support for Autotools entirely at some > point in 2019, so it seems good to make the switch sooner rather than > later. I think I converted all the configure flags to the new format. > Patches #3-6: For some reason these packages now need an explicit mesa > input. I haven't run into other packages that have this problem yet. The first two patches LGTM, but we should figure out why some packages need special attention and squash the fixes with the Mesa (or libdrm) change. I see the other packages are SDL-related, maybe the libSDL pkg-config files are different after this change? Or "sdl-config" prints something weird? Thanks for looking after these packages :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlyOi5cACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrnpAf+MDmBDTJkTU1ZRmATbMUludQPfBR5eQtMX6QPBQeuibxPnqUEseo+/Za5 Rm9yclwT6AFbMtlT+JezcYlSYuySJ90kTbPN34iHoeqELM91RozMn3fBxxxT6vnE J2X0ASEatyzV4Xz669u9NuW6kFuuzv3JxQd7DpA8IfAc2G21xT0ObmOy1q7Z09xY ona5IbV1ql9PhOcNE4H89qBsYAGEkFmXGsd4/T2fMxliItxwjOhC10X7vtDTyQhC dwsl5C7vjD8orz6YgUdxq0SNE5uU9jW+R1fBX5SOQup6VNcseOrS8lnQbm9CwD0u BJekaXQm0inKI1woYZF/y6ZLC7mh5A== =Lccv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--